Time & place
Lectures on Monday and Wednesday from 10:30-11:20 in 102 DeBartolo; discussion sections on Friday.
Topic
Bertrand Russell suggested that philosophical theories can be tested by their ability to deal with logical puzzles. This is the approach to philosophy that we will take in this course. The puzzles with which we will be concerned are paradoxes: sets of propositions each member of which is intuitively true but which nonetheless seem jointly inconsistent. Paradoxes of various sorts have been a focus of study in almost every area of philosophy; accordingly, this course will use paradoxes as a tool to raise questions about the following topics, among others: the nature of space and time; the nature of physical objects and change; the possibility of an omniscient and/or omnipotent God; the rules which govern what we rationally ought to believe, and what we rationally ought to do. We will also discuss more purely logical paradoxes such as the sorites and the liar. A subsidiary aim of the course will be to help students to appreciate the importance of consistent beliefs and to improve their ability to think clearly about the logical relations between claims.Texts
Students will be required to purchase Sainsbury's Paradoxes (3d edition, isbn 0521720796). Copies are available in the bookstore or online. Other readings will be made available in PDF form via links from the syllabus.
Assignments
There will be a midterm and non-cumulative final exam, each of which will consist of essay questions. There will also be three short analytical papers.
Date | Topic | Reading |
||
Wednesday, January 15 | What is a paradox?
What is a paradox?
|
none | ||
Paradoxes of space and time | ||||
Monday, January 20 | Zeno’s paradoxes
Zeno’s paradoxes
|
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, ch. 1 | ||
Wednesday, January 22 | Kant’s antinomies
Kant’s antinomies
|
Kant, "The antinomy of pure reason" (excerpt) extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, January 27 | Paradoxes of special relativity
Paradoxes of special relativity
|
Einstein, Relativity (excerpt) extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Wednesday, January 29 | Quantum mechanics and superposition
Quantum mechanics and superposition
|
Albert, "Superposition"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, February 3 | McTaggart’s proof of the unreality of time
McTaggart’s proof of the unreality of time
|
McTaggart, "Time" (excerpt) | ||
Metaphysical paradoxes | ||||
Wednesday, February 5 | Material objects: composition and constitution
Material objects: composition and constitution
|
Sider, "Constitution" | ||
Monday, February 10 | Material objects, continued | none
extra readings ↑
|
||
Wednesday, February 12 | Paradoxes of personal identity: teletransportation, split brains, & immaterial souls
Paradoxes of personal identity: teletransportation, split brains, & immaterial souls
|
Parfit, "Divided minds and the nature of persons"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, February 17 | Fate and the master argument
Fate and the master argument
|
Aristotle, De Interpretatione (selection) Epictetus, Discourses (selection) Taylor, "Fate" extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Wednesday, February 19 | The impossibility of free will
The impossibility of free will
|
van Inwagen, "The powers of rational beings: freedom of the will" | ||
Friday, February 21 | 1st paper due | |||
Monday, February 24 | Midterm exam (covers paradoxes of space & time and metaphysical paradoxes) | |||
Wednesday, February 26 & Monday, March 3 | Class canceled | |||
Theological paradoxes | ||||
Wednesday, March 5 | The paradox of heaven and hell
The paradox of heaven and hell
|
Sider, "Hell and vagueness" | ||
Spring break | ||||
Monday, March 17 | The paradox of the stone
The paradox of the stone
|
Aquinas, "Whether God is omnipotent?"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Wednesday, March 19 | The argument from evil
The argument from evil
|
Mackie, "Evil and omnipotence"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, March 24 | The Trinity and contradiction
The Trinity and contradiction
|
The Athanasian Creed
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Paradoxes of belief & action | ||||
Wednesday, March 26 | Newcomb’s problem
Newcomb’s problem
|
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, pp. 69-81 | ||
Monday, March 31 | 2nd paper due | |||
The prisoner’s dilemma
The prisoner’s dilemma
|
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, pp. 82-87 | |||
Wednesday, April 2 | The St. Petersburg & two-envelope paradoxes
The St. Petersburg & two-envelope paradoxes
|
Clark, "The St. Petersburg Paradox"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, April 7 | Paradoxes of confirmation
Paradoxes of confirmation
|
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, pp. 90-106 | ||
Wednesday, April 9 | The surprise exam
The surprise exam
|
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, pp. 107-114
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Monday, April 14 | Sleeping beauty
Sleeping beauty
|
Elga, "Self-locating belief and the sleeping beauty problem"
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Wednesday, April 16 | The lottery paradox
The lottery paradox
|
Hawthorne, Knowledge and Lotteries (excerpt) | ||
Easter break | ||||
Logical paradoxes | ||||
Wednesday, April 23 | Sainsbury, Paradoxes, ch. 3 | |||
Monday, April 28 | 3rd paper due | |||
The liar [guest lecture: Andrew Brenner] |
Sainsbury, Paradoxes, ch. 6
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
|||
The end of the world | ||||
Wednesday, April 30 | The doomsday argument
The doomsday argument
|
Leslie, The End of the World (excerpt)
extra readings ↓
extra readings ↑
|
||
Tuesday, May 6, from 4:15 to 6:15 p.m. in 102 DeBartolo | Final exam (covers theological paradoxes, paradoxes of belief & action, and logical paradoxes) |
Grading
The midterm exam and (non-cumulative) final exam will each be worth 35% of the final grade; short take home assignments will, collectively, be worth 10%. The remaining 20% of the final grade will be given on the basis of class attendance and participation.Each assignment is required, in the sense that failure to complete one or more assignments is sufficient to fail the course.
Notre Dame has no official way of indexing numerical grades to letter grades. This is the system that will be used in this course:
A | 94+ |
A- | 90-93 |
B+ | 87-89 |
B | 83-86 |
B- | 80-82 |
C+ | 77-79 |
C | 73-76 |
C- | 70-72 |
D | 60-69 |
F | 59- |
Honor code
In all of their assignments, students are responsible for compliance with the University’s honor code, information about which is available here. You should acquaint yourself with the policies and penalties described there.Sometimes, it can be hard to know what, exactly, the honor code implies with respect to different disciplines. For this reason, the philosophy department has prepared a document explaining, using examples, what the honor code requires of students when writing a philosophy paper. I strongly recommend that you read this document, which is available here. It is possible to violate the honor code without intending to do so; the best way to avoid this is to carefully read through the philosophy department's guidelines.
If you are in doubt about what the honor code requires of you in a particular case, please ask me.